AI Copilot Pro
Intelligent GRC Assistant
Ask anything about your audits, controls, risks, and workpapers — powered by multi-model AI
All systems operational
47
Conversations Today
+12 vs. yesterday
94%
Queries Resolved
+3% vs. last week
1.8s
Avg Response Time
-0.4s faster
2.1M
Tokens Used Today
68% of daily budget
Conversations
SOX ITGCs — Q3 Review
3 msgs · 2h ago
Control Gaps — Procurement
7 msgs · Yesterday
AP Process Risk Assessment
12 msgs · 15 min ago
Revenue Recognition Controls
5 msgs · 1h ago
Vendor Management Workpaper
8 msgs · 3h ago
IT Access Review Findings
4 msgs · 5h ago
Segregation of Duties Analysis
15 msgs
PCAOB Standard AS 2201
6 msgs
ERP Change Management Controls
9 msgs
AP Process Risk Assessment
Acme Corp · Started 15 min ago · Claude Sonnet
Model: $0.003/1K

Hello! I'm your AssurAI Copilot Pro. I have full context of your Acme Corp audit engagements, controls library, risk register, and workpapers. How can I help you today?

Try asking me to draft an audit finding, summarize a risk, review a control, or generate a workpaper section.

SK

Summarize the key risks in the Accounts Payable process and identify any control gaps based on our Q3 testing.

AP Process Risk Summary — Q3 2025

Based on your Q3 testing workpapers, I've identified 3 significant risks and 2 control gaps:

Key Risks:
1. Unauthorized payments — Segregation of duties gaps in payment approval workflow (rated: Significant)
2. Duplicate invoices — ERP matching logic bypassed for rush payments (rated: Moderate)
3. Vendor master fraud — Insufficient controls over vendor additions/changes (rated: Significant)

Control Gaps Identified:
• AP-CTRL-014: Payment threshold review not operating effectively — 4 of 25 samples exceeded approval limits without secondary sign-off
• AP-CTRL-022: Vendor change log review performed quarterly vs. required monthly

WP-AP-Q3-001 AP-CTRL-014 AP-CTRL-022 Risk Register
SK

Draft a formal audit finding for AP-CTRL-014 with condition, criteria, cause, and effect.

Audit Finding: Payment Authorization Controls — AP-CTRL-014

Condition: During testing of 25 payment transactions above $50,000 for the period July 1 – September 30, 2025, Internal Audit identified 4 instances (16%) where secondary approval was not obtained prior to payment release, contrary to Acme Corp's AP Policy §4.3.

Criteria: Per Acme Corp Accounts Payable Policy §4.3 (revised February 2025), all payments exceeding $50,000 require dual authorization: (1) AP Manager approval and (2) CFO or designated delegate sign-off within the ERP workflow before disbursement.

Cause: The ERP system's approval workflow allows a "rush payment" override flag that bypasses the dual-authorization routing. This override was implemented as a temporary measure during the August 2025 system migration but was not subsequently disabled.

Effect: Payments totaling $1.24M were disbursed without required secondary authorization, creating exposure to unauthorized or fraudulent disbursements. Additionally, Acme Corp is at risk of non-compliance with SOX Section 302/404 internal control assertions.

Recommendation: Disable the rush payment override flag in the ERP immediately. Implement a compensating detective control (daily exception report) until the system fix is validated. Re-perform testing on the 4 exception items to confirm payment legitimacy.

Management Response (draft): Management agrees with the finding. IT has been engaged to disable the override flag by October 15, 2025. AP Manager will review all flagged transactions retroactively.

Severity: Significant · Finding Type: Control Deficiency · Status: Open

AP Policy §4.3 AP-CTRL-014 SOX 302/404
Quick:
End-to-end encrypted · Context: Acme Corp Q3 Audit 0 / 4000
Analytics
Sonnet 4.5
62%
Haiku 3.5
24%
Opus 4
9%
GPT-4o
5%
Audit Findings 18 Control Review 14 Risk Summary 9 Workpaper Gen 6
1 Draft SOX finding for ITGC 7x
2 Summarize AP risk assessment 5x
3 Generate test procedure 4x
4 Review control design 3x
$18.42 / $27.00
68% of daily budget used · Resets at midnight
Panel